‘Please don’t vomit in the theatre. This is a historic building.’

The Royale's Human Centipede cupcakes

The Schube: So I took a trip this weekend to The Royale, an indie retro grindhouse theatre in an old building in downtown Mesa, Ariz., and now I’m kicking myself for not having checked out this place sooner.

The 48 seats in the place were about three-quarters full for a showing of the horror fan’s litmus test/endurance challenge that is “The Human Centipede 2: The Full Sequence.”

While the movie did just what I expected – left me wanting to wash my eyes out with bleach – the Royale itself was like some kind of magical little portal that David Lynch might have filmed as a metaphor for heaven in one of his flicks.

A few highlights: Before the movie starts, about 10 minutes before showtime, they play trailers for old-school schlock films and grainy B-movies, along with 70s commercials for various retro candies and sodas (which is the main thing they serve at the concession stand). I was a bit worried because the sound was a bit muffled and only seemed to be coming from one or two of the speakers. But I thought, maybe they’re intentionally trying to recreate that old Alamo Drafthouse-style experience with this bit. Yep, bingo.

Then a dude who works there comes in and the house lights go up. He gives a welcoming little speech to get everyone in the mood, and tells us that there is to be absolutely no checking voicemails or texting during this flick. (No one did.) He goes, “Last night, a guy passed out because this movie was too much for him. If you’re squeamish, prepare to be squeamed. The bathrooms are located behind the screen, back that way. Please don’t vomit in the theatre. This is a historic building.” And strolls out cool as you please, like he just dropped the frickin’ mic.

Then movie starts right up. And it’s pristine, great 5.1 surround sound, full bass, 1080p digital projection, the whole bit. This is what a modern grindhouse cinema looks like: embracing all the sleazy, low-budget atmosphere of its roots, and using modern technology to make the experience even better.

Interestingly, between each grainy old 60s and 70s trailer (likely piped in via dvd or blu-ray through a projector), there’s that little box that pops up on screen where you can see that they’re switching back and forth between “HDMI,” “game,” “dvd,” etc., the exact same way Eijo and I have to do on our own home theatre systems when we show old trailers before movies. I couldn’t help but think: This is the 2011 equivalent of the old-school test pattern, the scratchy film reel’s 3-2-1 countdown screen, the little audio and visual pops and clicks we used to get from yesteryear’s Alama Drafthouse stuff.

This Saturday, The Royale is showing a new high-def transfer of Lucio Fulci’s “Zombie” on the big screen. I mean, who else is doing that? (And where else can you see a zombie fight a shark underwater?)

Bonus points for being located across the street from Evermore Nevermore, a curio shop that has everything from a limited edition artist’s print of a Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 poster to a huge steampunk section where local artists are selling their stuff on commission — including a real framed butterfly that someone has intricately turned into a little mechanical device where, if you crank it, the butterfly opens its wings.

I know this kind of stuff ain’t for everyone. But for those of us who embrace the gloriously weird and culturally subversive, you’ll find a lot to wrap your arms around here. Check it out when you can.

With a Little Help from My Frenzy

Eijo: Hitchcock’s Frenzy was on HBO the other day, so I taped it (erm, excuse me, DVR’d it) and gave it a watch. Hm… Well, look, the thing is I only made it about halfway through.

Here’s the problem: so there’s a rash of rape-murders happening in London and the main character Blaney (a shady fellow with a nasty temper and a lush porno mustache) seems like the prime suspect, but then we find out the murderer’s actually his friend Bob. We of course find out in the worst way imaginable — Bob corners Blaney’s ex-wife in her office and rapes her before strangling her to death with his necktie, all while repeating the word “lovely” in an evermore grotesque voice (a precursor to Blue Velvet’s Frank Booth?). Yeesh.

First, the scene was totally unnecessary, but also I couldn’t help noticing the visual & pacing parallels with Psycho’s classic shower scene. Add the derivative murder to the redux opening credit sequence (the helicopter shot Hitchcock wasn’t able to pull off for Psycho 12 years earlier) and Frenzy feels less like a unique movie experience and more like an attempt to one-up his better work in a much less, shall I say, artistic way. I never would’ve called Psycho subtle, but then I clapped eyes on the first half of Frenzy.

So here’s my question… Should I finish watching Frenzy? Is there anything worthwhile that happens, or is it just more re-hashing of earlier better works? This kinda stuff is not the way I want to remember ol’ Hitch.

 

The Schube: I didn’t care for that one either. I’ve got it on a VHS tape in the closet and doubt I’ll ever give it a second watch or pick it up on DVD. I can’t remember much about the rest of the movie, but am pretty sure you’re not gonna miss anything that’ll blow your skirt up.

I’m a huge fan of some of Hitch’s stuff, but I won’t hesitate to say that some of his movies continue to fall flat for me. I’ve never understood the praise some folks lavish on Vertigo, for example. Hated, hated, hated Topaz. Dude, I’d rather have to watch three Renee Zellweger movies and one Sarah Jessica Parker flick than to have to sit through Topaz ever again. Oh, and I picked up Spellbound a few months ago on DVD and still haven’t gotten around to watching the second half.

But then, of course, there’s the 39 Steps. Psycho. The Birds. North By Freakin Northwest, bro. I could go on. I mean, I’ve got a Hitchcock poster hanging over my typewriter, so there ya go. (Actually, it’s hanging over my computer, but the writer in me still feels compelled to think of it like a typewriter when I’m pounding the keys and not surfin’ the interwebs.)

I guess it just goes to prove that even creative geniuses can have their slip-ups now and again. We just gotta love ‘em anyway (i.e. Uncle Stevie’s Dreamcatcher and Gerald’s Game), or learn to forgive (i.e. M. Night Shyamalan’s Any Movie After The Village).

 

Eijo: Hahaa! Hey, wait. I enjoyed Spellbound quite a bit, actually. I just like the idea that the new fellow running the asylum is actually the craziest poop-house rat in the building. That’s the one where Salvador Dali did production design for the dream sequences, right? Ooh, that’s a classic.

But your point is well-taken. I’ve watched Vertigo three times and still don’t see what people like about it — as far as I’m concerned, the best part of the movie is the hip late-’50s poster.

And Topaz is no good? That’s coming up on HBO next week and I’ve got it set to record. Hmm, well I’m gonna take your advice and delete Frenzy. Watch Psycho again instead.

 

The Schube: Well, give Topaz a go and see what you think. It bored the kneecaps off me but also had way too much double-agent back-and-forth tomfoolery for me to keep up with, and I lost interest fast. You’re smarter than me so you’ll probably have no trouble keeping up with it.

I gotta finish watching Spellbound now that you’ve got me curious about the rest of it.

Hey, folks, what do you think?  What do you consider the most overhyped or under-appreciated Hitch films?